• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Personnel
    • Professional Safety Staffing
  • Expert Witness
    • Jim Stanley
    • Steve Hawkins
    • Expert Witness Services
  • Compliance
    • Risk Assessments
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Fall Protection Safety Services
    • Forklift Safety Services
    • Machine Guarding Safety Services
    • Combustible Dust Compliance
    • Confined Space Safety
  • Safety Training
    • Safety Awareness
    • Instructor-led courses
    • Training Case Study
  • About
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Our Team
    • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
    • Safety Solutions Blog
    • Safety Terms Glossary
  • Careers
  • Contact
    FDRsafety
    • Personnel
      • Professional Safety Staffing
    • Expert Witness
      • Jim Stanley
      • Steve Hawkins
      • Expert Witness Services
    • Compliance
      • Risk Assessments
      • Industrial Hygiene
      • Fall Protection Safety Services
      • Forklift Safety Services
      • Machine Guarding Safety Services
      • Combustible Dust Compliance
      • Confined Space Safety
    • Safety Training
      • Safety Awareness
      • Instructor-led courses
      • Training Case Study
    • About
      • Our Mission and Values
      • Our Team
      • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
      • Safety Solutions Blog
      • Safety Terms Glossary
    • Careers
    • Contact

Enforcement

OSHA wants some violations to carry prison terms

  • Posted by Jim Stanley
  • Categories Enforcement, OSHA
  • Date June 22, 2010

OSHA has raised the ante on enforcement to a whole new level. The agency now would like to see some violations treated as crimes with prison terms attached.

Speaking to the American Society of Safety Engineers at the Safety 2010 meeting last week in Baltimore, OSHA’s head, David Michaels, said: “It’s an unfortunate fact that monetary penalties just aren’t enough. We believe that nothing focuses the mind like the threat of doing time in prison, which is why we need criminal penalties for employers who are determined to gamble with their workers’ lives and consider it merely a cost of doing business when a worker dies on the job.”

Later in the week, OSHA officially launched another enforcement initiative, the Severe Violators Enforcement Program.

The program, details of which were previously announced, would identify employers with repeated, serious violations, and subject them to increased inspections of the site where the violations took place as well as inspections of other sites the company may operate.

According to OSHA: “SVEP is intended to focus enforcement efforts on employers who have demonstrated recalcitrance or indifference to their OSH Act obligations by committing willful, repeated or failure-to-abate violations in one or more of the following circumstances: a fatality or catastrophe situation; in industry operations or processes that expose workers to severe occupational hazards; exposing workers to hazards related to the potential releases of highly hazardous chemicals; and all egregious enforcement actions.”

For advice on preparing yourself for OSHA scrutiny, see my article “How to meet the challenge of greatly increased OSHA scrutiny”

You may also wish to have a mock OSHA inspection conducted at your site.

  • Share:
Jim Stanley

Previous post

Is a workplace possible where no injuries occur?
June 22, 2010

Next post

Scrambling to keep the Gulf cleanup safe
June 29, 2010

You may also like

gavel
Reasonable Foreseeability – OSHA Matters
8 December, 2025
1600px-Point_Guarding
Review Commission Machine Guarding Decision
16 February, 2021
FallingRocks-1
Is Gravity Part of OSHA’s LOTO Regulation?
15 April, 2020

    2 Comments

  1. Brad Harbaugh
    June 22, 2010

    Jim,
    Great stuff. I especially like your article on meeting the challenge of increased OSHA scrutiny. We are recommending similar actions to our customers, especially in regards to recordkeeping. OSHA has signaled big changes coming soon to their data collection process that could require all employers under OSHA jurisdiction to submit Form 300 every year. http://blog.msdsonline.com/2010/06/osha-looks-to-modernize-injury-and-illness-data-collection-by-2011/

    In your opinion, would the threat of prison provide the improvement in compliance that OSHA is looking for?

  2. Brian Herrera
    May 25, 2011

    I agree with OSHA, I think CEO’s who do not take advice or do what the safety recommendations are documented to do should be in a willful categaroy and not only be fined but also may inherite a criminal offense and be subject to prison as well.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Categories

  • Accident Prevention
  • Articles
  • CSA
  • Enforcement
  • FDRsafety newsletter
  • Legislation
  • News and Announcements
  • OSHA
  • Recordkeeping
  • Research
  • Risk Assessments
  • Safety and sustainability
  • Temporary Safety Professionals / Recruiting
  • Training
  • Transportation safety
  • Uncategorized

Latest Posts

7 Principles for Effectively Managing Safety & Health
29Dec2025
Reasonable Foreseeability – OSHA Matters
08Dec2025
Additional Thoughts On Reevaluating OSHA
06Mar2025

Get In Touch

Contact

360 Cool Springs Boulevard,
Suite 101,
Franklin, TN 37067

1-888-755-8010

info@fdrsafety.com

Careers

Accreditations

Contact Us

Powered by WordPress.