• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Personnel
    • Professional Safety Staffing
    • Safety Recruiting
    • Careers with FDRsafety
  • Expert Witness
    • Jim Stanley
    • Steve Hawkins
    • Expert Witness Services
  • Compliance
    • Risk Assessments
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Fall Protection Safety Services
    • Forklift Safety Services
    • Machine Guarding Safety Services
    • Combustible Dust Compliance
    • Confined Space Safety
  • Safety Training
    • Safety Awareness
    • Instructor-led courses
    • Training Case Study
  • About
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Our Leaders
    • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
    • Safety Solutions Blog
    • Safety Terms Glossary
  • Careers
  • Contact
    FDRsafety
    • Personnel
      • Professional Safety Staffing
      • Safety Recruiting
      • Careers with FDRsafety
    • Expert Witness
      • Jim Stanley
      • Steve Hawkins
      • Expert Witness Services
    • Compliance
      • Risk Assessments
      • Industrial Hygiene
      • Fall Protection Safety Services
      • Forklift Safety Services
      • Machine Guarding Safety Services
      • Combustible Dust Compliance
      • Confined Space Safety
    • Safety Training
      • Safety Awareness
      • Instructor-led courses
      • Training Case Study
    • About
      • Our Mission and Values
      • Our Leaders
      • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
      • Safety Solutions Blog
      • Safety Terms Glossary
    • Careers
    • Contact

Enforcement

OSHA off-base with workplace violence proposal

  • Posted by Jim Stanley
  • Categories Enforcement, OSHA
  • Date October 25, 2011

Is it right for OSHA to penalize an employer for an incident that was completely beyond the company’s ability to prevent?

If that seems wrong to you, I agree. But that is exactly where OSHA is heading with a new directive issued to its inspectors.

It instructs those inspectors how to hold employers responsible under the General Duty clause for instances of workplace violence not even committed by one of the company’s employees.

In an excellent article about the directive in the Washington Examiner, Michael Billock, a labor and employment lawyer at Bond, Schoeneck & King PLLC in Albany, N.Y., creates a hypothetical situation that demonstrates where this could lead:

“Picture this scenario: One day, in a large hospital with thousands of patient visits per year, the unthinkable occurs — while a doctor explains unfortunate news to a patient’s family, a relative pulls a gun and mortally wounds the doctor.

“That hypothetical scenario would be terrible enough. But now imagine that, in the midst of the hospital trying to recover from this tragedy, a federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration investigator arrives to conduct an inspection.

“After months of interviewing employees, reviewing documents, and taking videotaped tours of the hospital, OSHA issues the hospital a citation and fine (!) on the basis that the violence was foreseeable and the hospital did not do enough to prevent it.”

Billock goes on to point out that General Duty clause was not intended to be used this way and that the directive provides employers no clue about what to do to avoid a citation.

This is yet another instance of overreaching by the “New” OSHA. Even though the agency appeared to be pulling back earlier this year to some degree on issues like noise, ergonomics and a proposed Injury and Illness Prevention Program, it is now clear that the agency intends to keep its overly aggressive approach in place. Proposals on noise and I2P2 are back and now OSHA is going even further with this misguided approach to workplace violence.

To keep up with the latest developments on OSHA subscribe to this blog and have it sent direct to your email box or reader.

  • Share:
Jim Stanley

Previous post

OSHA proposals on ergonomics, I2P2 tangled in fighting over budget
October 25, 2011

Next post

Safety should be part of ‘lean’ thinking in healthcare, elsewhere
October 31, 2011

You may also like

1600px-Point_Guarding
Review Commission Machine Guarding Decision
16 February, 2021
FallingRocks-1
Is Gravity Part of OSHA’s LOTO Regulation?
15 April, 2020
FDR-070918
OSHA Alert: How to Prepare for an OSHA Inspection
19 March, 2020

Search

Categories

  • Accident Prevention
  • Articles
  • CSA
  • Enforcement
  • FDRsafety newsletter
  • Legislation
  • News and Announcements
  • OSHA
  • Recordkeeping
  • Research
  • Risk Assessments
  • Safety and sustainability
  • Temporary Safety Professionals / Recruiting
  • Training
  • Transportation safety
  • Uncategorized

Latest Posts

Additional Thoughts On Reevaluating OSHA
06Mar2025
Feasibility For Machine Guarding Is A Big Deal For Employers and Employees
13May2024
Online Powered Industrial Truck Operator Certification Problems
25Aug2023

Get In Touch

Contact

360 Cool Springs Boulevard,
Suite 101,
Franklin, TN 37067

1-888-755-8010

info@fdrsafety.com

Careers

Accreditations

Contact Us

Powered by WordPress.