• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Personnel
    • Professional Safety Staffing
    • Safety Recruiting
    • Careers with FDRsafety
  • Expert Witness
    • Jim Stanley
    • Steve Hawkins
    • Expert Witness Services
  • Compliance
    • Risk Assessments
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Fall Protection Safety Services
    • Forklift Safety Services
    • Machine Guarding Safety Services
    • Combustible Dust Compliance
    • Confined Space Safety
  • Safety Training
    • Safety Awareness
    • Instructor-led courses
    • Training Case Study
  • About
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Our Leaders
    • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
    • Safety Solutions Blog
    • Safety Terms Glossary
  • Careers
  • Contact
    FDRsafety
    • Personnel
      • Professional Safety Staffing
      • Safety Recruiting
      • Careers with FDRsafety
    • Expert Witness
      • Jim Stanley
      • Steve Hawkins
      • Expert Witness Services
    • Compliance
      • Risk Assessments
      • Industrial Hygiene
      • Fall Protection Safety Services
      • Forklift Safety Services
      • Machine Guarding Safety Services
      • Combustible Dust Compliance
      • Confined Space Safety
    • Safety Training
      • Safety Awareness
      • Instructor-led courses
      • Training Case Study
    • About
      • Our Mission and Values
      • Our Leaders
      • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
      • Safety Solutions Blog
      • Safety Terms Glossary
    • Careers
    • Contact

Enforcement

OSHA budget plan: Agency still pushing enforcement, but pulls back in one area

  • Posted by Jim Stanley
  • Categories Enforcement, OSHA, Recordkeeping
  • Date February 15, 2011

With the President trying to accommodate business on the issue of excessive regulation, OSHA seems to be trying to walk a tightrope in its budget request for 2012.

The agency is asking for 25 additional compliance officers. That is in keeping with a two-year trend of increased emphasis on enforcement. OSHA chief David Michaels also gave other indications of continued pressure on enforcement in a webchat Monday:

• The agency’s top priority, he said, is a putting into place an Injury and Illness Prevention Program, which has become known as I2P2. The agency is proposing that every company under its jurisdiction be required to develop a safety program that meets specific OSHA requirements.

As I have blogged previously, while it is an excellent idea to require every company to have a safety program, it is not a good idea to force companies to follow specific requirements. Businesses vary too much to make that practical.

• The agency is also proposing to expand its Site Specific Targeting program. That program currently targets companies with 40 or more employees that have high injury rates. OSHA is proposing to broaden the program to include companies with 20 or more employees.

“By targeting employers with high injury rates who have 20 or more employees, we will be impacting a far larger group of workplaces, while actually conducting a slightly higher number of inspections,” Michaels said. “In 2012, we project about 2,000 SST inspections compared to 1,780 conducted in FY 2010.”

Backing off on Voluntary Protection Program

On the other hand, Michaels said OSHA was backing away from a plan to reduce support for the Voluntary Protection Program. This program encourages voluntary cooperation between companies and OSHA.

OSHA had proposed eliminating the appropriation to run the program and redirecting the funding elsewhere. In its place, OSHA wanted a fee-based system to fund the program. But Michaels said Monday, “We are no longer proposing alternative funding for the Voluntary Protection Program (VPP). OSHA will continue to fund VPP out of the federal compliance assistance budget activity.”

This pullback follows two other retreats on enforcement last month, when OSHA said it was withdrawing both a noise control proposal and a plan to add an separate ergonomics column to the injury and illness recordkeeping log companies are required to keep.

Withdrawing those two proposals and restoring the voluntary cooperation program with industry will go a long way to righting the “excessive” regulation that the President pointed to as a barrier to economic growth. Further moderation of enforcement zeal would help as well.

  • Share:
Jim Stanley

Previous post

Preventing machine hazards just got easier
February 15, 2011

Next post

Why emphasizing safety builds trust with employees
February 19, 2011

You may also like

1600px-Point_Guarding
Review Commission Machine Guarding Decision
16 February, 2021
FallingRocks-1
Is Gravity Part of OSHA’s LOTO Regulation?
15 April, 2020
FDR-070918
OSHA Alert: How to Prepare for an OSHA Inspection
19 March, 2020

Search

Categories

  • Accident Prevention
  • Articles
  • CSA
  • Enforcement
  • FDRsafety newsletter
  • Legislation
  • News and Announcements
  • OSHA
  • Recordkeeping
  • Research
  • Risk Assessments
  • Safety and sustainability
  • Temporary Safety Professionals / Recruiting
  • Training
  • Transportation safety
  • Uncategorized

Latest Posts

Additional Thoughts On Reevaluating OSHA
06Mar2025
Feasibility For Machine Guarding Is A Big Deal For Employers and Employees
13May2024
Online Powered Industrial Truck Operator Certification Problems
25Aug2023

Get In Touch

Contact

360 Cool Springs Boulevard,
Suite 101,
Franklin, TN 37067

1-888-755-8010

info@fdrsafety.com

Careers

Accreditations

Contact Us

Powered by WordPress.