• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Personnel
    • Professional Safety Staffing
    • Safety Recruiting
    • Careers with FDRsafety
  • Expert Witness
    • Jim Stanley
    • Steve Hawkins
    • Expert Witness Services
  • Compliance
    • Risk Assessments
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Fall Protection Safety Services
    • Forklift Safety Services
    • Machine Guarding Safety Services
    • Combustible Dust Compliance
    • Confined Space Safety
  • Safety Training
    • Safety Awareness
    • Instructor-led courses
    • Training Case Study
  • About
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Our Leaders
    • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
    • Safety Solutions Blog
    • Safety Terms Glossary
  • Careers
  • Contact
    FDRsafety
    • Personnel
      • Professional Safety Staffing
      • Safety Recruiting
      • Careers with FDRsafety
    • Expert Witness
      • Jim Stanley
      • Steve Hawkins
      • Expert Witness Services
    • Compliance
      • Risk Assessments
      • Industrial Hygiene
      • Fall Protection Safety Services
      • Forklift Safety Services
      • Machine Guarding Safety Services
      • Combustible Dust Compliance
      • Confined Space Safety
    • Safety Training
      • Safety Awareness
      • Instructor-led courses
      • Training Case Study
    • About
      • Our Mission and Values
      • Our Leaders
      • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
      • Safety Solutions Blog
      • Safety Terms Glossary
    • Careers
    • Contact

Enforcement

Labor Department’s lawyers to fight reductions of OSHA penalties, attack industry-wide issues

  • Posted by Jim Stanley
  • Categories Enforcement, OSHA, Recordkeeping
  • Date January 12, 2011

As OSHA pushes forward with tougher enforcement, the critical role played by the legal office of the Department of Labor is not always fully appreciated. The office of the Solicitor of Labor is not a part of OSHA, but handles its legal work and has a significant role in calling the shots on enforcement.

So for those trying to figure out where OSHA is headed, the annual operating plan issued by the solicitor’s office can provide important clues.

Jonathan Snare and Howard Radzely of the Morgan Lewis law firm have done an excellent job of analyzing that document in a recent article.

Among the things to watch for from OSHA and the solicitor’s office:

• Action from a new “Penalty Reduction Task Force,” set up to reduce the rate of cases in which administrative law judges and the OSHA Review Commission substantially reduce OSHA penalties.

• More publicity about litigation against alleged violators. This matches up with OSHA’s plan to make increased use of public “shaming” of companies that are issued citations.

• Greater emphasis on targeting allegedly unlawful practices across industries and enterprises, rather than company-by-company enforcement. What this means, Snare and Razely say, is: “employers should be alert to industry enforcement trends, and immediately adapt their policies and procedures to match current enforcement patterns. Employers no longer have the luxury of waiting for particular industry enforcement trends to ‘hit’ (or not) at their workplace, nor can they assume that enforcement will be limited to one facility.”

• Action from an “Ergonomics Response Team” to identify cases that have set precedents contrary to the agency’s agenda and then find cases that can be used to reverse those precedents.

• Development of a strategy to litigate against companies that evade penalties and compliance by going in and out of business.

The office is also preparing for expected legal challenges to the cranes standard and to the proposal to include a separate column to record musculoskeletal disorders on the OSHA 300 accident and illness log.

To keep up with the latest news about increased OSHA enforcement, subscribe to this blog and have it sent automatically to your Reader or email box.

  • Share:
Jim Stanley

Previous post

OSHA is making a racket about noise: What it means for employers
January 12, 2011

Next post

Keep alert to off-shift, contractor risks you may not see
January 17, 2011

You may also like

1600px-Point_Guarding
Review Commission Machine Guarding Decision
16 February, 2021
FallingRocks-1
Is Gravity Part of OSHA’s LOTO Regulation?
15 April, 2020
FDR-070918
OSHA Alert: How to Prepare for an OSHA Inspection
19 March, 2020

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Categories

  • Accident Prevention
  • Articles
  • CSA
  • Enforcement
  • FDRsafety newsletter
  • Legislation
  • News and Announcements
  • OSHA
  • Recordkeeping
  • Research
  • Risk Assessments
  • Safety and sustainability
  • Temporary Safety Professionals / Recruiting
  • Training
  • Transportation safety
  • Uncategorized

Latest Posts

Additional Thoughts On Reevaluating OSHA
06Mar2025
Feasibility For Machine Guarding Is A Big Deal For Employers and Employees
13May2024
Online Powered Industrial Truck Operator Certification Problems
25Aug2023

Get In Touch

Contact

360 Cool Springs Boulevard,
Suite 101,
Franklin, TN 37067

1-888-755-8010

info@fdrsafety.com

Careers

Accreditations

Contact Us

Powered by WordPress.