• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Personnel
    • Professional Safety Staffing
    • Safety Recruiting
    • Careers with FDRsafety
  • Expert Witness
    • Jim Stanley
    • Steve Hawkins
    • Expert Witness Services
  • Compliance
    • Risk Assessments
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Fall Protection Safety Services
    • Forklift Safety Services
    • Machine Guarding Safety Services
    • Combustible Dust Compliance
    • Confined Space Safety
  • Safety Training
    • Safety Awareness
    • Instructor-led courses
    • Training Case Study
  • About
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Our Leaders
    • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
    • Safety Solutions Blog
    • Safety Terms Glossary
  • Careers
  • Contact
    FDRsafety
    • Personnel
      • Professional Safety Staffing
      • Safety Recruiting
      • Careers with FDRsafety
    • Expert Witness
      • Jim Stanley
      • Steve Hawkins
      • Expert Witness Services
    • Compliance
      • Risk Assessments
      • Industrial Hygiene
      • Fall Protection Safety Services
      • Forklift Safety Services
      • Machine Guarding Safety Services
      • Combustible Dust Compliance
      • Confined Space Safety
    • Safety Training
      • Safety Awareness
      • Instructor-led courses
      • Training Case Study
    • About
      • Our Mission and Values
      • Our Leaders
      • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
      • Safety Solutions Blog
      • Safety Terms Glossary
    • Careers
    • Contact

Accident Prevention

Foundry accident raises questions about use of personal protective equipment

  • Posted by Jim Stanley
  • Categories Accident Prevention, Enforcement, OSHA
  • Date April 24, 2010

A recent catastrophic accident claimed the life of a worker at a ductile iron foundry. This terrible accident raises questions in my mind about compliance with OSHA’s personal protective equipment (PPE) regulations.

Three employees were injured and sent to the hospital, two of them with burns. One employee (the deceased) sustained burns over 75 percent of her body when molten metal erupted from a vessel at the foundry.

29CFR 1910.132 requires employers to assess their workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment.

Employers are required to:

1) Assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of PPE.

2) If hazards are present or likely to be present, select, and have each affected employee use, the types of PPE that will protect from the identified hazards (eg. hardhats, safety glasses, aluminized clothing.)

3) Communicate selection decisions to each affected employee.

4) Select PPE that properly fits each affected employee.

In addition, the employer must verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed and the dates of the assessment.

Have a specific question about how this OSHA regulation applies to you? Email me at jstanley@fdrsafety.com.

  • Share:
Jim Stanley

Previous post

5S: Getting management to practice what it preaches
April 24, 2010

Next post

OSHA asks new rules on employer safety programs; ups ante on ergonomics
April 27, 2010

You may also like

1600px-Point_Guarding
Review Commission Machine Guarding Decision
16 February, 2021
driving-KXYKSKZ
How to get back to the basics behind the wheel.
12 October, 2020
FallingRocks-1
Is Gravity Part of OSHA’s LOTO Regulation?
15 April, 2020

    3 Comments

  1. Eric Jacobs
    January 10, 2011

    Hi
    I am currenly completing my Masters degree in occupational health. My reseach topic is the Resons why employees is reluctand to PPE in the workplace. I would appreciate it if you can supply me with information or any other reseach that have been done on the topic.

  2. Personal Protection Equipment
    February 25, 2011

    Hello Eric, One of the reason is that employee is reluctant because some company do not providing PPE freely, it take charges for providing PPE’s and another reason is everywhere employee goes they need to take care of all their equipment. So employee is not willing for PPE.

  3. John
    April 20, 2013

    supervisors and managers play a significant role in ensuring that employees are in the proper PPE and from my experience most fail to do that.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Categories

  • Accident Prevention
  • Articles
  • CSA
  • Enforcement
  • FDRsafety newsletter
  • Legislation
  • News and Announcements
  • OSHA
  • Recordkeeping
  • Research
  • Risk Assessments
  • Safety and sustainability
  • Temporary Safety Professionals / Recruiting
  • Training
  • Transportation safety
  • Uncategorized

Latest Posts

Additional Thoughts On Reevaluating OSHA
06Mar2025
Feasibility For Machine Guarding Is A Big Deal For Employers and Employees
13May2024
Online Powered Industrial Truck Operator Certification Problems
25Aug2023

Get In Touch

Contact

360 Cool Springs Boulevard,
Suite 101,
Franklin, TN 37067

1-888-755-8010

info@fdrsafety.com

Careers

Accreditations

Contact Us

Powered by WordPress.