• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Personnel
    • Professional Safety Staffing
    • Safety Recruiting
    • Careers with FDRsafety
  • Expert Witness
    • Jim Stanley
    • Steve Hawkins
    • Expert Witness Services
  • Compliance
    • Risk Assessments
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Fall Protection Safety Services
    • Forklift Safety Services
    • Machine Guarding Safety Services
    • Combustible Dust Compliance
    • Confined Space Safety
  • Safety Training
    • Safety Awareness
    • Instructor-led courses
    • Training Case Study
  • About
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Our Leaders
    • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
    • Safety Solutions Blog
    • Safety Terms Glossary
  • Careers
  • Contact
    FDRsafety
    • Personnel
      • Professional Safety Staffing
      • Safety Recruiting
      • Careers with FDRsafety
    • Expert Witness
      • Jim Stanley
      • Steve Hawkins
      • Expert Witness Services
    • Compliance
      • Risk Assessments
      • Industrial Hygiene
      • Fall Protection Safety Services
      • Forklift Safety Services
      • Machine Guarding Safety Services
      • Combustible Dust Compliance
      • Confined Space Safety
    • Safety Training
      • Safety Awareness
      • Instructor-led courses
      • Training Case Study
    • About
      • Our Mission and Values
      • Our Leaders
      • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
      • Safety Solutions Blog
      • Safety Terms Glossary
    • Careers
    • Contact

Enforcement

Confusion abounds about OSHA’s recordkeeping pilot program

  • Posted by Jim Stanley
  • Categories Enforcement, OSHA, Recordkeeping
  • Date October 6, 2010

A confusing picture has emerged about the status of an OSHA pilot program to crack down on alleged under-reporting of accidents and illnesses.

As noted on this blog in August, a trade publication called Inside OSHA (subscription required to view) reported that OSHA was suspending a pilot recordkeeping program to clamp down on the alleged under-reporting. The newsletter said that the reason for the suspension was that the program had not found significant numbers of violations.

OSHA announced the program last year and said it would concentrate on industries with traditionally high accident rates. Within those industries, companies that have reported low accident rates were to be the most likely to be audited because of suspicions that the low rate might be generated by under-reporting.

But this week Jordan Barab, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA, said that the recordkeeping program had not been shelved. Rather, he said, the program is refocusing on large manufacturing sites, according to an account by the Center for Public Integrity, a non-profit group that conducts investigative journalism. Barab said OSHA has inspected 187 worksites as part of its Recordkeeping National Emphasis Program, finding violations in about half of them.

OSHA has come under criticism from a different non-profit, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, which also said the recordkeeping program has been suspended. The group, known as PEER, said the agency had been ignoring high-hazard industries – petroleum refineries, chemical plants and paper mills, for example – while focusing on small businesses and certain geographic areas.

The criticism is unusual because OSHA has been stepping up enforcement since the Obama administration took over. Most previous questioning about the agency’s enforcement efforts has come from business groups saying that OSHA has been too aggressive.

Regardless of how this confusing situation plays out, it is vital for all companies to do a thorough job in compiling injury and illness records to meet OSHA requirements. For some hints on how to do so, see my post on the top 10 mistakes companies make with OSHA recordkeeping.

To keep up with the latest news about increased OSHA enforcement, subscribe to this blog and have it sent automatically to your Reader or email box.

  • Share:
Jim Stanley

Previous post

October 2010 newsletter
October 6, 2010

Next post

New evidence sustainability efforts don't focus enough on safety
October 15, 2010

You may also like

1600px-Point_Guarding
Review Commission Machine Guarding Decision
16 February, 2021
FallingRocks-1
Is Gravity Part of OSHA’s LOTO Regulation?
15 April, 2020
FDR-070918
OSHA Alert: How to Prepare for an OSHA Inspection
19 March, 2020

    1 Comment

  1. Abel
    October 7, 2010

    PEER messed up, the Recordkeeping NEP was reissued September 28, 2010 (http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=DIRECTIVES&p_id=4629), 7 day before their press release. And refineries and chemical plants were left off because, wait for it, they’re already covered under NEPs.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Categories

  • Accident Prevention
  • Articles
  • CSA
  • Enforcement
  • FDRsafety newsletter
  • Legislation
  • News and Announcements
  • OSHA
  • Recordkeeping
  • Research
  • Risk Assessments
  • Safety and sustainability
  • Temporary Safety Professionals / Recruiting
  • Training
  • Transportation safety
  • Uncategorized

Latest Posts

Additional Thoughts On Reevaluating OSHA
06Mar2025
Feasibility For Machine Guarding Is A Big Deal For Employers and Employees
13May2024
Online Powered Industrial Truck Operator Certification Problems
25Aug2023

Get In Touch

Contact

360 Cool Springs Boulevard,
Suite 101,
Franklin, TN 37067

1-888-755-8010

info@fdrsafety.com

Careers

Accreditations

Contact Us

Powered by WordPress.