• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Personnel
    • Professional Safety Staffing
    • Safety Recruiting
    • Careers with FDRsafety
  • Expert Witness
    • Jim Stanley
    • Steve Hawkins
    • Expert Witness Services
  • Compliance
    • Risk Assessments
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Fall Protection Safety Services
    • Forklift Safety Services
    • Machine Guarding Safety Services
    • Combustible Dust Compliance
    • Confined Space Safety
  • Safety Training
    • Safety Awareness
    • Instructor-led courses
    • Training Case Study
  • About
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Our Leaders
    • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
    • Safety Solutions Blog
    • Safety Terms Glossary
  • Careers
  • Contact
    FDRsafety
    • Personnel
      • Professional Safety Staffing
      • Safety Recruiting
      • Careers with FDRsafety
    • Expert Witness
      • Jim Stanley
      • Steve Hawkins
      • Expert Witness Services
    • Compliance
      • Risk Assessments
      • Industrial Hygiene
      • Fall Protection Safety Services
      • Forklift Safety Services
      • Machine Guarding Safety Services
      • Combustible Dust Compliance
      • Confined Space Safety
    • Safety Training
      • Safety Awareness
      • Instructor-led courses
      • Training Case Study
    • About
      • Our Mission and Values
      • Our Leaders
      • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
      • Safety Solutions Blog
      • Safety Terms Glossary
    • Careers
    • Contact

Enforcement

Repeat citations against U.S. Minerals, Postal Service show OSHA will keep coming back

  • Posted by Jim Stanley
  • Categories Enforcement, OSHA, Recordkeeping
  • Date December 28, 2010

OSHA is delivering on its promise to organizations it considers to be “severe violators” – it is going to visit other facilities the organization owns to see if there are problems there as well.

One example is U.S. Minerals Co., against which OSHA has proposed penalties of more than $870,000 for citations at three facilities. The company was also placed in OSHA’s new Severe Violator Enforcement Program. The citations resulted from two inspections at the company’s Baldwin, Ill., facility, followed by one at its Harvey, La., location and one at its Galveston, Texas, facility.

A company placed in the Severe Violators Enforcement Program is subject to having all their facilities inspected to see if a problem found at one location is occurring elsewhere as well.

But OSHA is also showing up at multiple locations for companies not placed in the Severe Violators program.

The top example is a bit surprising: The U.S. Postal Service. OSHA has issued citations against at least 17 postal facilities in 2009 and 2010 with proposed penalties, mostly for electrical hazards, of about $4.5 million. As a result, OSHA issued a complaint asking that the Postal Service be ordered to correct electrical violations at 350 facilities. It is the first time the department has sought enterprise-wide relief as a remedy.

And this fall, OSHA cited a well-known retailer and proposed fines of more than $180,000 for failing to document and report injuries and illnesses at a distribution center. OSHA said the company willfully disregarded OSHA regulations. That followed citations in 2009 for willful recordkeeping violations at two other locations with proposed penalties of more than $100,000.

OSHA defines as a willful violation as one “committed with intentional, knowing or voluntary disregard for the law’s requirement, or plain indifference to employee safety and health.”

The lesson In this is clear for companies with multiple locations – your safety program must be consistent corporation wide. At the first sign of a problem at one location, you need to make sure it is not occurring elsewhere.

To keep up with the latest news about increased OSHA enforcement, subscribe to this blog and have it sent automatically to your Reader or email box.

  • Share:
Jim Stanley

Previous post

Stage set for OSHA clash with House over its enforcement agenda
December 28, 2010

Next post

Cut health insurance costs by reducing off-the-job injuries
December 31, 2010

You may also like

1600px-Point_Guarding
Review Commission Machine Guarding Decision
16 February, 2021
FallingRocks-1
Is Gravity Part of OSHA’s LOTO Regulation?
15 April, 2020
FDR-070918
OSHA Alert: How to Prepare for an OSHA Inspection
19 March, 2020

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Categories

  • Accident Prevention
  • Articles
  • CSA
  • Enforcement
  • FDRsafety newsletter
  • Legislation
  • News and Announcements
  • OSHA
  • Recordkeeping
  • Research
  • Risk Assessments
  • Safety and sustainability
  • Temporary Safety Professionals / Recruiting
  • Training
  • Transportation safety
  • Uncategorized

Latest Posts

Additional Thoughts On Reevaluating OSHA
06Mar2025
Feasibility For Machine Guarding Is A Big Deal For Employers and Employees
13May2024
Online Powered Industrial Truck Operator Certification Problems
25Aug2023

Get In Touch

Contact

360 Cool Springs Boulevard,
Suite 101,
Franklin, TN 37067

1-888-755-8010

info@fdrsafety.com

Careers

Accreditations

Contact Us

Powered by WordPress.