• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Personnel
    • Professional Safety Staffing
    • Safety Recruiting
    • Careers with FDRsafety
  • Expert Witness
    • Jim Stanley
    • Steve Hawkins
    • Expert Witness Services
  • Compliance
    • Risk Assessments
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Fall Protection Safety Services
    • Forklift Safety Services
    • Machine Guarding Safety Services
    • Combustible Dust Compliance
    • Confined Space Safety
  • Safety Training
    • Safety Awareness
    • Instructor-led courses
    • Training Case Study
  • About
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Our Leaders
    • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
    • Safety Solutions Blog
    • Safety Terms Glossary
  • Careers
  • Contact
    FDRsafety
    • Personnel
      • Professional Safety Staffing
      • Safety Recruiting
      • Careers with FDRsafety
    • Expert Witness
      • Jim Stanley
      • Steve Hawkins
      • Expert Witness Services
    • Compliance
      • Risk Assessments
      • Industrial Hygiene
      • Fall Protection Safety Services
      • Forklift Safety Services
      • Machine Guarding Safety Services
      • Combustible Dust Compliance
      • Confined Space Safety
    • Safety Training
      • Safety Awareness
      • Instructor-led courses
      • Training Case Study
    • About
      • Our Mission and Values
      • Our Leaders
      • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
      • Safety Solutions Blog
      • Safety Terms Glossary
    • Careers
    • Contact

Enforcement

OSHA’s shaming of innocent companies lives forever

  • Posted by Jim Stanley
  • Categories Enforcement, OSHA
  • Date February 8, 2013

OSHA citations come and go, but the agency’s news releases never die – even when they announce alleged violations at companies who are eventually found not to be in violation of OSHA regulations.

The barrage of news releases the agency issues each month announcing enforcement actions are part of a strategy of deterrence that OSHA Assistant Secretary of Labor David Michaels is happy to describe. Michaels has said he views the shaming news releases as a cost-effective way to increase enforcement without hiring additional inspectors.

The problem is that the press releases are issued when OSHA alleges violations and proposes fines against a company, not when the cases are resolved. In my opinion, however, after the news release is issued the company is viewed by its industry peers as being in violation of OSHA regulations. (What happened to innocent until proven guilty?) So a company’s reputation can be hurt, and is hurt in many instances, over allegations of violations that are unproven.

A case in point

AK Steel’s Butler, Pa, manufacturing facility is just one example of a company where a news release was issued, in this case alleging that the company failed to record outcomes indicating hearing hazards for workers.

In June 2011, OSHA cited AK Steel for willful violations that addressed the company’s failure from 2007 to 2010 to record standard threshold shifts on the OSHA 300 log. OSHA news release defined a willful violation as one committed with plain indifference to, or intentional disregard, for employee safety and health.

In my opinion, however, AK Steel is one of the safest steel manufacturing companies in the world and has an undisputed reputation for safe operations.

AK Steel chose to contest the violations and all were ultimately dismissed by an Occupational Safety and Review Commission judge. OSHA, however, did not throw out the original press release. It lives on the agency’s website – never updated.

It’s how OSHA does it

This is OSHA’s standard operating procedure. You will be hard pressed to find an updated press release on its website. Don’t get me wrong: Companies that endanger worker health and safety ought to be cited. But it’s time for OSHA to start playing fair.

Companies are not guilty until proven innocent. OSHA ought to be willing to take a dose of its own medicine. If OSHA issues incorrect citations/violations the mistake ought to be made public. OSHA could easily update its original release with the news, for example, that violations have been dismissed.That way the public could get the rest of the story.

Subscribe to this workplace safety blog and receive Jim Stanley’s posts in your inbox or on your reader.

  • Share:
Jim Stanley

Previous post

Keeping current on drug and alcohol testing rules
February 8, 2013

Next post

More of the same: Michaels to stay on as head of OSHA
February 11, 2013

You may also like

1600px-Point_Guarding
Review Commission Machine Guarding Decision
16 February, 2021
FallingRocks-1
Is Gravity Part of OSHA’s LOTO Regulation?
15 April, 2020
FDR-070918
OSHA Alert: How to Prepare for an OSHA Inspection
19 March, 2020

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Categories

  • Accident Prevention
  • Articles
  • CSA
  • Enforcement
  • FDRsafety newsletter
  • Legislation
  • News and Announcements
  • OSHA
  • Recordkeeping
  • Research
  • Risk Assessments
  • Safety and sustainability
  • Temporary Safety Professionals / Recruiting
  • Training
  • Transportation safety
  • Uncategorized

Latest Posts

Additional Thoughts On Reevaluating OSHA
06Mar2025
Feasibility For Machine Guarding Is A Big Deal For Employers and Employees
13May2024
Online Powered Industrial Truck Operator Certification Problems
25Aug2023

Get In Touch

Contact

360 Cool Springs Boulevard,
Suite 101,
Franklin, TN 37067

1-888-755-8010

info@fdrsafety.com

Careers

Accreditations

Contact Us

Powered by WordPress.