• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Personnel
    • Professional Safety Staffing
  • Expert Witness
    • Jim Stanley
    • Steve Hawkins
    • Expert Witness Services
  • Compliance
    • Risk Assessments
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Fall Protection Safety Services
    • Forklift Safety Services
    • Machine Guarding Safety Services
    • Combustible Dust Compliance
    • Confined Space Safety
  • Safety Training
    • Safety Awareness
    • Instructor-led courses
    • Training Case Study
  • About
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Our Team
    • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
    • Safety Solutions Blog
    • Safety Terms Glossary
  • Careers
  • Contact
    FDRsafety
    • Personnel
      • Professional Safety Staffing
    • Expert Witness
      • Jim Stanley
      • Steve Hawkins
      • Expert Witness Services
    • Compliance
      • Risk Assessments
      • Industrial Hygiene
      • Fall Protection Safety Services
      • Forklift Safety Services
      • Machine Guarding Safety Services
      • Combustible Dust Compliance
      • Confined Space Safety
    • Safety Training
      • Safety Awareness
      • Instructor-led courses
      • Training Case Study
    • About
      • Our Mission and Values
      • Our Team
      • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
      • Safety Solutions Blog
      • Safety Terms Glossary
    • Careers
    • Contact

OSHA

OSHA’s misguided view on safety incentive programs

  • Posted by Jim Stanley
  • Categories OSHA, Recordkeeping
  • Date November 20, 2015

OSHA is again taking a misguided stand against safety incentive programs as part of an effort to protect workers from retaliation for reporting injuries or illnesses.

As reported by InsideOSHAonline.com, the agency has drafted a policy paper titled “Protecting Whistleblowers: Recommended Practices for Employers for Preventing and Addressing Retaliation,” that will be finalized after the agency considers public input, due Jan. 19. OSHA says the paper is intended to guide employers on creating a non-retaliatory work environment.

OSHA’s theory is that workers may be intimidated from reporting injuries or illnesses by programs that reward employee work groups with prizes for low injury or illness rates or that tie those rates to bonuses for supervisors.

The problem with that theory is that many companies with excellent safety programs and a strong commitment to safety use incentive programs. In my view, they ought to be allowed to continue to do so if they choose.

A fairer way to address alleged instances of retaliation is for OSHA to be required to identify an injury or illness that was not reported and prove that the failure to report was due to intimidation.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Share:
Jim Stanley

Previous post

Some small employers exempt from regular OSHA inspections
November 20, 2015

Next post

 Updated ANSI standards a significant tool for U.S. industry
December 2, 2015

You may also like

gavel
Reasonable Foreseeability – OSHA Matters
8 December, 2025
1600px-Point_Guarding
Review Commission Machine Guarding Decision
16 February, 2021
FallingRocks-1
Is Gravity Part of OSHA’s LOTO Regulation?
15 April, 2020

Search

Categories

  • Accident Prevention
  • Articles
  • CSA
  • Enforcement
  • FDRsafety newsletter
  • Legislation
  • News and Announcements
  • OSHA
  • Recordkeeping
  • Research
  • Risk Assessments
  • Safety and sustainability
  • Temporary Safety Professionals / Recruiting
  • Training
  • Transportation safety
  • Uncategorized

Latest Posts

7 Principles for Effectively Managing Safety & Health
29Dec2025
Reasonable Foreseeability – OSHA Matters
08Dec2025
Additional Thoughts On Reevaluating OSHA
06Mar2025

Get In Touch

Contact

360 Cool Springs Boulevard,
Suite 101,
Franklin, TN 37067

1-888-755-8010

info@fdrsafety.com

Careers

Accreditations

Contact Us

Powered by WordPress.