• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Personnel
    • Professional Safety Staffing
    • Safety Recruiting
    • Careers with FDRsafety
  • Expert Witness
    • Jim Stanley
    • Steve Hawkins
    • Expert Witness Services
  • Compliance
    • Risk Assessments
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Fall Protection Safety Services
    • Forklift Safety Services
    • Machine Guarding Safety Services
    • Combustible Dust Compliance
    • Confined Space Safety
  • Safety Training
    • Safety Awareness
    • Instructor-led courses
    • Training Case Study
  • About
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Our Leaders
    • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
    • Safety Solutions Blog
    • Safety Terms Glossary
  • Careers
  • Contact
    FDRsafety
    • Personnel
      • Professional Safety Staffing
      • Safety Recruiting
      • Careers with FDRsafety
    • Expert Witness
      • Jim Stanley
      • Steve Hawkins
      • Expert Witness Services
    • Compliance
      • Risk Assessments
      • Industrial Hygiene
      • Fall Protection Safety Services
      • Forklift Safety Services
      • Machine Guarding Safety Services
      • Combustible Dust Compliance
      • Confined Space Safety
    • Safety Training
      • Safety Awareness
      • Instructor-led courses
      • Training Case Study
    • About
      • Our Mission and Values
      • Our Leaders
      • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
      • Safety Solutions Blog
      • Safety Terms Glossary
    • Careers
    • Contact

Accident Prevention

ANSI B11 and risk assessment: The best kept secret in safety

  • Posted by Mike Taubitz
  • Categories Accident Prevention, Risk Assessments
  • Date September 22, 2014

My goal in writing this blog post is to whet the appetite of those who may not be sufficiently familiar with ANSI B11, the series of U.S. national standards dealing with the safety requirements for general industry machines.

At the recent ASSE Professional Development Conference, there was considerable focus on risk assessment, voluntary standards and prevention through design.   The primary reason to become familiar with ANSI B11 is that it guides risk assessment.

Risk assessment is one of the most powerful safety tools we have. Without it, you are left to the old debate of “Yes we have a hazard – what do we do about it?” Risk assessment, or RA for short, will guide you in the application of feasible risk reduction controls. Importantly, RA (especially Task Based Risk Assessment) is a powerful offensive and defensive tool to ward off potential OSHA citations.

When you become proficient in RA (like everything in life, it takes a little practice), you will note many missed opportunities where risk could have been reduced during concept and design of the machine or equipment. The challenge for our profession is to get risk assessment integrated into the curricula of future engineers. If enough safety professionals are using risk assessment, perhaps we can influence ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) and academia to similarly adopt the method for educating engineers.

Remember that the goal of risk assessment is to achieve feasible risk reduction. That which might have been readily feasible during design is often no longer feasible after something is built. It is like putting on an addition to a house — a missing electrical outlet that would have cost a couple of bucks during construction is now a costly retrofit.

The B11 family provides tangible guidance for both engineers and safety pros to put a machine into operation with “acceptable risk.” Acceptable risk is not zero risk. It is defined as “A risk level achieved after risk reduction measures have been applied. It is a risk level that is accepted for a given task (hazardous situation) or hazard.”

I have written about B11 previously. If there is sufficient interest, we might consider a coordinated series of blogs that explore all of these concepts in more detail. Are you ready to unlock the “best kept secret” in safety? Let us know if you would like more detail on how the standards can help you reduce risk in your workplace.

  • Share:
Mike Taubitz

Previous post

September 2014 newsletter
September 22, 2014

Next post

New OSHA recordkeeping requirements take effect Jan. 1
September 23, 2014

You may also like

driving-KXYKSKZ
How to get back to the basics behind the wheel.
12 October, 2020
Amputations in Manufacturing – A New OSHA National Emphasis Program
16 January, 2020

On December 10, 2019 OSHA published CPL 03-00-022, National Emphasis Program on Amputations in Manufacturing Industries. This Instruction supersedes OSHA Instruction CPL 03-00-019, National Emphasis Program on Amputations that was published in August of 2015. This updated Instruction: • Revises …

No More Overlooking Work Zone Accidents
30 May, 2019

Last week we published a blog highlighting the dangers faced by teenagers while driving, specifically carpooling. An appropriate topic for the kick-off to what has become known as the 100 Deadliest Days. Thanks to overwhelming media coverage this phrase and …

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Categories

  • Accident Prevention
  • Articles
  • CSA
  • Enforcement
  • FDRsafety newsletter
  • Legislation
  • News and Announcements
  • OSHA
  • Recordkeeping
  • Research
  • Risk Assessments
  • Safety and sustainability
  • Temporary Safety Professionals / Recruiting
  • Training
  • Transportation safety
  • Uncategorized

Latest Posts

Additional Thoughts On Reevaluating OSHA
06Mar2025
Feasibility For Machine Guarding Is A Big Deal For Employers and Employees
13May2024
Online Powered Industrial Truck Operator Certification Problems
25Aug2023

Get In Touch

Contact

360 Cool Springs Boulevard,
Suite 101,
Franklin, TN 37067

1-888-755-8010

info@fdrsafety.com

Careers

Accreditations

Contact Us

Powered by WordPress.