• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Personnel
    • Professional Safety Staffing
  • Expert Witness
    • Jim Stanley
    • Steve Hawkins
    • Expert Witness Services
  • Compliance
    • Risk Assessments
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Fall Protection Safety Services
    • Forklift Safety Services
    • Machine Guarding Safety Services
    • Combustible Dust Compliance
    • Confined Space Safety
  • Safety Training
    • Safety Awareness
    • Instructor-led courses
    • Training Case Study
  • About
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Our Team
    • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
    • Safety Solutions Blog
    • Safety Terms Glossary
  • Careers
  • Contact
    FDRsafety
    • Personnel
      • Professional Safety Staffing
    • Expert Witness
      • Jim Stanley
      • Steve Hawkins
      • Expert Witness Services
    • Compliance
      • Risk Assessments
      • Industrial Hygiene
      • Fall Protection Safety Services
      • Forklift Safety Services
      • Machine Guarding Safety Services
      • Combustible Dust Compliance
      • Confined Space Safety
    • Safety Training
      • Safety Awareness
      • Instructor-led courses
      • Training Case Study
    • About
      • Our Mission and Values
      • Our Team
      • FDRsafety Senior Advisors
      • Safety Solutions Blog
      • Safety Terms Glossary
    • Careers
    • Contact

Enforcement

Top 10 mistakes companies make with OSHA recordkeeping

  • Posted by Jim Stanley
  • Categories Enforcement, OSHA, Recordkeeping
  • Date September 27, 2010

One of the most persistent sources of problems we see as safety consultants is confusion over how to handle OSHA recordkeeping requirements for accidents and illnesses.

Arthur Sapper, an attorney with McDermott Will & Emery and a leader in OSHA compliance law, has written an excellent and comprehensive article about the top mistakes he sees employers making on their OSHA 300 logs.

At the top of his list: The mistaken belief by employers that if an injured worker can still perform useful work, the injury need not be recorded as a work restriction.

Others:

• Believing that light duty is not a recordable work restriction.
• Failing to give proper weight to the account of an accident provide by the injured employee.
• Misunderstanding the recordability of a non-occupational injury that was aggravated on the job.
• Failing to keep track of days away from work for an injured employee who has stopped reporting for work because he or she is on long-term injury leave.

The full article is well worth reading.

  • Share:
Jim Stanley

Previous post

Piling it on: A roundup of recent OSHA penalties that were north of $100,000
September 27, 2010

Next post

OSHA issuing more 'egregious' violations, but they may not hold up
September 29, 2010

You may also like

gavel
Reasonable Foreseeability – OSHA Matters
8 December, 2025
1600px-Point_Guarding
Review Commission Machine Guarding Decision
16 February, 2021
FallingRocks-1
Is Gravity Part of OSHA’s LOTO Regulation?
15 April, 2020

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Categories

  • Accident Prevention
  • Articles
  • CSA
  • Enforcement
  • FDRsafety newsletter
  • Legislation
  • News and Announcements
  • OSHA
  • Recordkeeping
  • Research
  • Risk Assessments
  • Safety and sustainability
  • Temporary Safety Professionals / Recruiting
  • Training
  • Transportation safety
  • Uncategorized

Latest Posts

7 Principles for Effectively Managing Safety & Health
29Dec2025
Reasonable Foreseeability – OSHA Matters
08Dec2025
Additional Thoughts On Reevaluating OSHA
06Mar2025

Get In Touch

Contact

360 Cool Springs Boulevard,
Suite 101,
Franklin, TN 37067

1-888-755-8010

info@fdrsafety.com

Careers

Accreditations

Contact Us

Powered by WordPress.