Safety Consultants    1-888-755-8010    info@FDRsafety.com

T: 1-888-755-8010
E: info@FDRsafety.com

 

Occupational Safety Blog

By Fred Rine, CEO of FDRsafety and former long-time Managing Director of Safety and Health at FedEx, Jim Stanley, President of FDRsafety and former No. 2 at OSHA headquarters and Mike Taubitz, Senior Advisor to FDRsafety and former Global Safety Director for General Motors.


Archive for the ‘Legislation’ Category

Proposed changes to OSHA Act punish business, employers representative says

July 14th, 2010 posted by Jim Stanley

Jim Stanley

Proposed changes to OSHA that are now working their way through Congress, including increased penalties, focus on punishing employers and will not improve workplace safety and health, a representative of a coalition of employer groups testified Tuesday.

“Penalties alone will not improve workplace safety—remember, in most cases, penalties are imposed after the fact of an injury or fatalities,” said Jonathan Snare, speaking for the Coalition of Workplace Safety, which includes the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other employer groups. He was testifying before the House Education and Labor Committee.

“The critical mission of OSHA is to assist employers to make sure these injuries and fatalities never occur in the first place. … This approach can be achieved by using existing programs that offer compliance assistance, outreach, and training.”

David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor of OSHA, had a different point of view.

“Safe jobs exist only when employers have adequate incentives to comply with OSHA’s requirements,” he said. “Those incentives are affected, in turn, by both the magnitude and the likelihood of penalties.”

Snare and Michaels disagreed on a number of other proposed amendments to the OSHA Act, which have been merged into a bill that would make changes to the Mine Safety and Health Act:

  • Rules that would no longer grant employers an automatic stay of requirements that they abate an OSHA violation that they are contesting:

    Michaels said the change was needed among other reasons because OSHA is often forced to negotiate a reduction in penalties in order to obtain agreement from an employer to correct a hazard while a violation is under contest. As a result, he said, “the average current OSHA penalty is only around $1,000.”

    But Snare said: “Abatement is more than just protecting against a hazard; it is part of accepting responsibility for the violation. Mandating abatement before allowing the employer to exhaust their adjudicative process would be like asking a criminal or civil defendant to pay a fine or serve a sentence before the trial is held.”

  • Increased protection for whistleblowers:


    Michaels said the proposed changes would bring whistleblower provisions in the OSHA Act in line with whistleblower provisions for other agencies.

    “The proposed legislation would prohibit employers from discouraging the reporting of
    work-related injuries and illnesses by employees,” Michaels said. “OSHA is strongly committed to accurate reporting of both injuries and illnesses.”

    But Snare said the proposals would “create additional complicated and costly procedures for adjudicating whistleblower cases, without any evidence or justification that the existing protections available to employees under Section 11(c) of the OSH Act are somehow deficient. The CWS is also concerned with other proposals in Section 701 which are overly punitive on employers and will benefit no one, aside from trial lawyers.”

As I said in a previous blog posting, this bill would radically alter the OSHA landscape. Employers would be well advised to follow the bill’s progress closely and begin examining their safety programs in light of changes that would occur if the bill is passed.

To read the full text of Snare’s statement, click here.

For Michaels’s statementclick here.

The Education and Labor Committee is likely to vote on the bill in the next few days and the full House may vote by the end of the month.

To keep up with this bill, as well as the administrative steps OSHA is taking to step up enforcement, subscribe to our blog and have it delivered automatically to your mailbox or Reader.

Share




More details on dramatic proposed changes to OSHA Act

July 9th, 2010 posted by Jim Stanley

Jim Stanley

As I wrote in an earlier post legislation is moving through the House of Representatives that would dramatically change the OSHA Act, increasing protection for whistleblowers and making officers and directors subject to criminal liability for OSHA violations in certain situations.

The bill would also greatly reduce an employer’s ability to delay abatement of contested violations.

Attorneys at the firm of Morgan Lewis have written an excellent article with additional details about the implications of the bill.

Morgan Lewis says, and I agree, that employers need to pay close attention to the proposed law and the impact it could have on their operations. Employers also need to be reviewing their health and safety programs in light of the dramatic changes that could come.

Share




Radical change to OSHA advancing in Congress

July 7th, 2010 posted by Jim Stanley

Jim Stanley

Prison terms of up to 10 years could be imposed on officers and directors of companies that knowingly violate OSHA rules under a proposed revision to the Occupational Safety and Health Act now advancing through Congress.

The 10-year term would apply in situations where a violation contributed to the death of an employee. The current maximum sentence under the OSHA act is six months and the law does not specify that officers and directors can be held criminally responsible.

Employers need to pay close attention to this bill since the provision on criminal penalties is only one of several proposed enforcement changes in the bill that would radically alter the occupational safety and health landscape for employers. In my view the bill would significantly change OSHA as we now know it.

The proposed measure is in keeping with the Obama administration’s philosophy of substantially increasing enforcement, which OSHA has already been carrying out administratively in such areas as training, recordkeeping, ergonomics and severe violations.

The proposed revisions to the law, introduced as the Protecting America’s Workers Act, have been percolating for months. But it now appears that the House Education and Labor Committee will hold a hearing on the bill on July 13, followed soon after by a committee vote. The bill could reach the floor of the House by the end of the month.

The bill originally was a standalone measure, but now has been combined with a bill to make changes in the Mine Safety and Health Administration. Pressure is strong to change MSHA because of the fatal accident that occurred earlier this year at a Massey Energy Co. mine in West Virginia and that in turn makes it more likely that changes to OSHA will pass as well.

One especially significant change to the OSH Act would allow officers and directors to be held criminally liable In cases where they had knowledge of violations that led to a fatality. The law currently states that an employer may be held criminally liable, but the definition of an employer is vague enough that it rarely is enforced against individual managers. The new bill specifies that the term “employer” means officers and directors.

Other changes In the bill:

  • Employers would be required to immediately begin abating serious, willful or repeated violations. Currently abatement requirements are automatically stayed if an employer contests a violation. Under the bill, employers who want a stay would have to ask for one from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. (I call this provision the “guilty until you prove yourself innocent” clause.)
  • Protections for “whistleblower” employees would be significantly strengthened. It appears to me that the bill would make it virtually impossible for employers to discharge an under-performing employee for cause if that employee makes any kind of complaint about safety conditions, warranted or not. This has a potential to severely inhibit employers’ ability to hold employees and managers accountable.
  • Prison terms of up to five years could be imposed on any officer or director of a company that knowingly violates any OSHA standard, rule or order if that violation contributes to serious bodily harm to an employee. Currently there is no provision in the OSHA act for a prison term in such situations.
  • The maximum civil penalty for willful and repeated violations would increase from $70,000 to $120,000. If the violation resulted in a death, the maximum penalty could be $250,000.
  • The maximum civil penalty for serious violations would increase from $7,000 to $12,000. However, if the serious violation resulted in a death, the maximum penalty could be $50,000.
  • The maximum civil penalty for other-than-serious violations would also increase from $7,000 to $12,000.
  • Minimum and maximum penalties would be adjusted for inflation at least once every four years beginning in 2015.

For tips on how to prepare your company for increased OSHA scrutiny, see my article “How to meet the challenge of greatly increased OSHA enforcement.”

Share




A strong analysis of the Kennedy OSHA bill

September 9th, 2009 posted by Jim Stanley

Jim Stanley

As detailed in other entries on this blog, a bill introduced by the late Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass) would have a huge impact on occupational safety law, broadening the scope of those covered and increasing penalties, among other things.

The law firm of McDermott Will & Emery has published an excellent analysis of the bill, which may be viewed by clicking here.

Share




Details on far-reaching scope of Kennedy OSHA bill

September 1st, 2009 posted by Jim Stanley

Jim Stanley

Proposed changes to the Occupational Safety and Health Act, which I wrote about in an earlier post, are quite far-reaching. Besides expanding coverage of the act to all federal and state government employees and some local government workers, it would allow those injured in work-related accidents to participate in OSHA inspections of the employer. It would also, among other things, allow employees and unions to contest settlements between OSHA and employers that withdraw or modify citations and increase the penalties for “repeat and willful” violations.

Rod Smith and Pat Miller of the Sherman & Howard law firm have prepared an excellent summary of the provisions of the bill, which was introduced by the late Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.).

Share




Kennedy bill would put more workers under OSHA

August 12th, 2009 posted by Jim Stanley

Jim Stanley

Sen. Ted Kennedy has introduced a bill to amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act that would, among other things, expand OSHA coverage to 8.5 million public sector workers who are employed by state, county and local governments, but are not covered by an OSHA state plan.

The bill’s purpose is to “expand coverage under the Act, to increase protections for whistleblowers, to increase penalties for certain violators, and for other purposes,” according to the text of the bill. The bill has 19 co-sponsors.

For more information: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-1580

Several OSHA-related bills had already been introduced on the House side, some with provisions similar to the Senate bill.

Share




New OSHA program focuses on records of low-incidence employers in high-rate industries

July 29th, 2009 posted by Jim Stanley

Jim Stanley

OSHA is stepping up its on-site inspection of injury and illness records as part of a new National Emphasis Program focusing on employers with low incidence rates who operate in high-rate industries. The program also will include a sample of construction firms.

The program, called NEP for short, starts in August was developed in response to Congressional hearings last year on a perceived problem of underreporting. The initiative is in line with OSHA’s movement towards a more enforcement-oriented approach.

Inspections under the initial stage of the program will take place over 12 months with an expectation that the program will be expanded after data from those initial inspections are analyzed. While the program is limited to states under federal OSHA’s jurisdiction, state plan OSHA programs are encouraged to conduct their own recordkeeping enforcement initiatives.

Included in the inspections will be a review of medical files for both occupational and non-occupational cases for 2007 and 2008, including 301 forms, Workers’ Compensation forms, absentee reports, and audiograms, for a selected sample of employees. Interviews will also be conducted with managers and employees to determine whether there is an injury-reporting system in place and whether incentive programs discourage employees from reporting new cases. Recordkeepers will be questioned to determine their level of training and knowledge of the recordkeeping regulations. Healthcare providers will be asked whether the employer has tried to influence the treatments provided and the recordability of cases. A limited walk-around inspection of the employer’s facility also will be conducted to determine if the hazards in the facility are consistent with the injuries and illnesses on the 300 log. Citations may be issued for any observed violations.

Employers should get ready for these inspections by:

  • Reviewing 2007 and 2008 cases to gauge the accuracy of their OSHA 300 logs and make
    sure there is an OSHA 301 or its equivalent for every recordable case.
  • Ensuring that appropriate training has been provided to recordkeepers.
  • Reviewing the effectiveness of both the reporting system for illnesses and injuries and the process for routing medical information from internal and external healthcare providers to the recordkeeper.
  • Evaluating whether the safety incentive program, if there is one, improperly discourages the reporting of work-related injuries or illnesses.

If you have questions or concerns about this program or how to get ready for it, please

Share




What’s ahead under Obama’s OSHA

June 23rd, 2009 posted by Jim Stanley

Jim Stanley

With Barack Obama’s election came widespread expectations of change at OSHA. Now those changes are starting to take shape. Here are five things to look for:

  1. Larger monetary penalties for violations: These are included in a measure called the Protecting America’s Workers Act, which is expected to pass Congress.
  2. More aggressive enforcement: The new Secretary of Labor, Hilda Solis, has pledged to “put enforcement back into the Department of Labor” – including more OSHA inspections. Additionally, OSHA’s aggressive National Emphasis Programs are ramping up in various industries, including refineries, chemical companies, general manufacturing, construction and any industry involving combustible dust. Employers can expect a shift away from the cooperative policy of the recent past to a more aggressive, citation/violation-based approach.
  3. More inspectors: OSHA will probably increase its enforcement staff to support its emphasis on high-risk industries, such as construction and heavy manufacturing.
  4. More attention to recordkeeping: OSHA will increase its focus on this regulation because it believes that many employers have been inaccurately reporting injuries and illnesses for some time.
  5. More liability for actions of subcontractors: New this year is enhanced OSHA liability for employers on multi-employer worksites. The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that OSHA can increase its citation/violation authority over owners and controlling employers for the safety actions of subcontractors. The case was Solis v. Summit Contractors.

So what can companies do to get ready for this tougher enforcement environment?

The best step is to ensure that your safety and health program is effective and enforced at all levels of the organization.

You can also have a mock OSHA inspection conducted in your workplace. This will review hazards assessments, training and required documentation, safe job procedures, operator certifications, recordkeeping and required safety and health program implementation (lockout, confined space, fall protection, etc.). Utilizing third-party professionals can ensure unbiased feedback about your programs.

Share